|
Get 9,000+ Interview Questions with Answers in an eBook
Home >>GMAT >>Essays>>Essay - 13
The following appeared as part of a campaign to sell
advertising time on a local
radio station to local businesses.
�The Cumquat Cafe began advertising on
our local radio station this year and was delighted
to see its business increase by 10 percent over last year�s totals. Their
success shows you how you can use
radio advertising to make your business more profitable.�
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In an attempt to sell radio advertising time,
this ad claims that radio advertising will make businesses more profitable. The
evidence cited is a ten percent increase
in business that the Cumquat Cafe has experienced in the year during which it
advertised on the local radio station.
This argument is unconvincing because two questionable assumptions must be made
for the stated evidence to support the
author�s conclusion.
The first assumption is that radio
advertising alone has caused the increase in business at the Cumquat Cafe. This
assumption is questionable because it
overlooks a number of other factors that might have contributed to the Cumquat�s
success. For example, the Cumquat might
have changed owners or chefs;
it might have launched a coupon
ad campaign in the local print
media; or it might have changed
or updated the menu. Yet another possibility is that a local competitor went
out of business. These are just a few of
the factors that could help explain the
Cumquat�s growth. Because the author fails to eliminate these possibilities,
the assumption in question
need not
be accepted.
Even if it is granted
that radio advertising is responsible for
the Cumquat�s success, another assumption must be made before we can conclude
that radio advertising will result in increased profits for businesses in
general. We must also assume that what is true of the Cumquat
will likewise be true of most other businesses. But there are all kinds of
important differences between cafes and other businesses
that could affect how radio audiences react to their advertising. We cannot
safely assume that because a small restaurant has benefited from radio
advertising, any and all local businesses will similarly benefit.
In conclusion, it would be imprudent
for a business to invest in radio
advertising solely on the basis of the evidence presented. To strengthen
the conclusion, it must be established that radio advertising was the principal
cause of increased business at the Cumquat. Once
this is shown, it must be determined that the business in
question is sufficiently like the Cumquat,
and so can expect similar returns from
investment in radio ad time.
|
|
|