Home >> GMAT >> Essays >> Essay - 34
The following appeared as part of a plan proposed by an executive of the Easy
Credit Company to the president.
�The Easy Credit Company would gain an advantage over competing credit card
services if we were to donate a portion of the proceeds from the use of our cards to
a well-known environmental organization in exchange for the use of its symbol or
logo on our card. Since a recent poll shows that a large percentage of the public is
concerned about environmental issues, this policy would attract new customers,
increase use among existing customers, and enable us to charge interest rates that
are higher than the lowest ones available.�
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument the author concludes that the Easy Credit Company would gain several advantages over its competitors by donating a
portion of its profits to a well-known environmental organization in exchange for the use of the organization�s logo on their credit card.
The author reaches this conclusion on the basis of a recent poll that shows widespread public concern about environmental issues.
Among the advantages of this policy, the author foresees an increase in credit card use by existing customers, the ability to charge
Page numbers AWA
higher interest rates, and the ability to attract new customers. While the author�s argument has some merit, it suffers from two critical
problems.
To begin with, the author assumes that the environmental organization whose logo is sought is concerned with the same environmental
issues about which the poll shows widespread concern. However, the author provides no evidence that this is the case. It is possible that
very few credit-card users are concerned about the issues that are the organization�s areas of concern; if so, then it is unlikely that the
organization�s logo would attract much business for the Easy Credit Company.
Next, the author assumes that the public�s concern about environmental issues will result in its taking steps to do something about the
problem�in this case, to use the Easy Credit Company credit card. This assumption is unsupported and runs contrary to experience.
Also, it is more reasonable to assume that people who are concerned about a particular cause will choose a more direct means of
expressing their concern.
In conclusion, the author�s argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen the argument, the author must show a positive link
between the environmental issues about which the public has expressed concern and the issues with which this particular environmental
organization is concerned. In addition, the author must provide evidence to support the assumption that concern about a problem will
cause people to do something about the problem.
|